What is the relationship between Writing and Design?
The relationship between writing
and design and it's effect on good communication is much more relevant than I
had previously thought. Lisa Ede's view point makes communication seem like
much more than just words and their meaning. People can say what they need to
say by using images and the world around us to express the meaning they need
to. With the amount of technology in today's world, design has become so much
more advanced than it once was. Without design and it's presence in
communication, we would have a lesser chance of expressing our thoughts in the
fullest way possible.
Characteristics of a Good Communicator:
Checklist
- Know your audience
- Be Confident in what you say
- Tone of Message
- Clarity
- Correct Grammar
- Set Purpose
- Don't repeat yourself
- Structure of main points
Thinking Through Production- Page 331:
My initial response to “The Wizard of Oz” movie poster is that it looks really old fashioned. The purpose is to promote the
movie and get people to go see it. It uses bright colors to attract a more
cheerful audience. The poster shows a big cast and many theatrical elements. The
choices that the maker made was to use bright colors, a lot of wording, and
different pictures of different scenes from the movie. The choices work
together to create a sense that a lot happens in the movie. With that being
said, I actually do not think that the poster works because there is no focus
on anything in particular. There is so much going on and it is hard to
determine what to expect from the movie.
My Review of Abby's Researched Synthesis:
QUESTIONS FOR REVISING A SYNTHESIS ESSAY
- Does the title give you some indication of the
writer’s attitude toward the topic? If not, suggest a title.
Yes, the title expresses the importance the writer places on music. - Is there an interesting lead that attracts the
reader’s attention? If not, suggest how the writer might begin the paper.
Yes,
the lead into the paper begins by stating the importance of music is in
remembering memories from your past, and then goes into the disease of
Alzheimer’s.
- Does the writer give you sufficient background
information on the topic in the introduction so that you understand the
context of the discussion? What seems to be missing from that background?
Yes, there is enough background info. - How does the writer make his or her overall purpose
clear to the reader? Does the thesis state the paper’s purpose?
yes, it suggests that music can benefit Alzheimer patients. - Restate the writer’s point of view on the topic as
expressed in the thesis. After reading the introduction, what three or
four main ideas will be developed in the body of the paper?
Music can help patients with Alzheimers. Main Points: help their memory, vocalization, and overall mood. - As you read each body paragraph,
answer these questions:
- What is
the purpose that the writer is trying to accomplish in that paragraph?
- How does
the writer develop the main idea of the paragraph? Is that sufficient to understand the
topic?
- How does
the writer relate that purpose back to the thesis?
The body paragraphs are not written yet, but the points in which she has laid out correlate directly to the introduction.
- Does the writer
introduce each source by qualifying the author and summarizing the article
being used? The author has yet to add sources.
- How does the writer
identify relationships among sources? What kinds and where (how often)? Not yet.
- In each paragraph,
does the writer provide sufficient context about the sources and does the
writer use sufficient support from the sources to illustrate and express
relationships?
Not yet. - How many sentences of development
of topic does the writer provide in each of the paragraphs, before
introducing sources? Is it at least 3-4 sentences? Has not completed.
- Does the conclusion do more than simply summarize the
main points of the paper? If so, how?
If not, suggest what else the writer might include in the
conclusion. Has not written the conclusion.
- Does the writer include properly formatted parenthetical
documentation where it is necessary and clearly differentiate among
sources? Not yet.
- Is there a Works Cited page? Is it done correctly? No
My Review of Sarah's Researched Synthesis:
QUESTIONS FOR REVISING A SYNTHESIS ESSAY
- Does the title give you some indication of the
writer’s attitude toward the topic? If not, suggest a title.
No title. Make a title that correlates with the sense of fear expressed in the introduction in order to use that emotional draw to interest readers. - Is there an interesting lead that attracts the
reader’s attention? If not, suggest how the writer might begin the paper.
Yes,
it begins with a simple statement that creates the image of fear in children
that causes an emotional response.
- Does the writer give you sufficient background
information on the topic in the introduction so that you understand the
context of the discussion? What seems to be missing from that background?
There is enough background info. - How does the writer make his or her overall purpose
clear to the reader? Does the thesis state the paper’s purpose?
She clearly states the wan to help the kids who have suffered. - Restate the writer’s point of view on the topic as
expressed in the thesis. After reading the introduction, what three or
four main ideas will be developed in the body of the paper?
Help suffering children. Main Points: Reintegration, Counseling, and Healing brokenness - As you read each body paragraph, answer these questions:
- What is
the purpose that the writer is trying to accomplish in that paragraph?
- How does
the writer develop the main idea of the paragraph? Is that sufficient to understand the
topic?
- How does
the writer relate that purpose back to the thesis?
The body paragraphs could use more support and elaboration.
- Does the writer introduce
each source by qualifying the author and summarizing the article being
used? No
- How does the writer
identify relationships among sources? What kinds and where (how often)?
- In each paragraph,
does the writer provide sufficient context about the sources and does the
writer use sufficient support from the sources to illustrate and express
relationships?
Yes, but could elaborate. - How many sentences of development
of topic does the writer provide in each of the paragraphs, before
introducing sources? Is it at least 3-4 sentences? Yes, around 3-4 sentences are written
- Does the conclusion do more than simply summarize the
main points of the paper? If so, how?
If not, suggest what else the writer might include in the
conclusion. No conclusion.
- Does the writer include properly formatted parenthetical
documentation where it is necessary and clearly differentiate among
sources? No, there is only one in text citation.
- Is there a
Works Cited page? Is it done correctly? No
No comments:
Post a Comment